February 21, 2007

  Volume 5, Number 8

Published in Wake Forest, NC

  Carol Pelosi, Publisher and Editor
 
 
 
 
 
 
Archives
Where To Find It
Town Meetings
Club Meetings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Required campus trees
cut from 234 to 69

            The Wake Forest commissioners revisited – twice – the question of the 23 landmark trees that will be cut down during the development of Southeastern Baptist Theological Seminary’s western campus.

            They also agreed they will have to follow the same rules or standards in developing the town hall site on Brooks Street where there are at least three oaks 24 inches or more in diameter, classifying them as landmark trees.

            The planning board had recommended the 23 trees be replaced on a ratio of one new tree for every 3 inches of old trees, which would have meant the seminary planting 234 3-inch trees in addition to the trees required by the zoning ordinance.

            Commissioner Stephen Barrington’s motion to approve the master plan with the tree condition removed was approved three to two.

            Commissioner Frank Drake said he was “hung up” on the words in the zoning ordinance: “every effort shall be made to protect” any tree or trees. Commissioner Margaret Stinnett, who pointed out the wording in the ordinance, had unanswered concerns: the location of a driveway, access in or out of a driveway on Stadium Drive, whether parking spaces were included for dormitories and the alignment of the proposed extension of Rock Spring Road after a block of Wingate Street is closed.

            “I had a telephone call Monday, and Mrs. Paschal is adamantly opposed to a road in that particular area,” Stinnett said.

            The schematic for the campus master plan and on the town’s transportation plan show Rock Spring running between the seminary president’s house and the G.W. Paschal house and continuing across Durham Road near what was Miss Jo Williams’ boarding house that is now the seminary guest house.

            Immediately after the vote on Barrington’s motion, Drake asked if he could “supplement” the motion to include a three to one tree replacement. Attorney Eric Vernon said he would have to look at the procedures, there was a five-minute break and several whispered huddles. The result was a motion to reconsider.

            Drake’s motion was that, within a year of the loss of any of the 23 trees the seminary would replant of any species on a 3-to-1 ratio anywhere on the campus.

            “I kind of like the idea of a tree mitigation policy,” Commissioner David Camacho said. “The thing that gives me heartburn is we’re sort of winging it, making it up at the meeting.”

            After planner Lisa Potts said the Urban Forestry Board is close to completing a tree ordinance with a tree-mitigation policy that includes a requirement identical to what Drake suggested for landmark trees.

            “I thought you had pulled that out of thin air,” Camacho told Drake, who said he was not that smart.

            Stinnett wanted more in light of the damage to campus trees by Hurricane Fran, ice storms and old age. “I think we have the obligation to protect them [the 23 trees] because it is part of what makes Wake Forest Wake Forest. Three-inch caliper trees are not as tall as you and I. We need to do everything we possibly can to keep the forest in Wake Forest.”

            When Mayor Vivian Jones called for a vote, Barrington did not say anything and his vote counted as a yes with Drake and Commissioner Velma-Boyd Lawson. He protested, saying he did not hear Jones call for a vote and was thinking of a question. “I thought I restated the motion. I think I gave you ample opportunity to question,” Jones said, denying his request to vote.

 
Copyright © 2006
The Wake Forest Gazette
All Rights Reserved