February 14, 2007

  Volume 5, Number 7

Published in Wake Forest, NC

  Carol Pelosi, Publisher and Editor
 
 
 
 
 
 
Archives
Where To Find It
Town Meetings
Club Meetings
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 

 Financial column
Which IRA?
By Louis Mullinger, Edward Jones (Financial planning)

           An IRA is certainly a great way to save money for retirement. But which IRA is right for you, traditional or Roth? As is often the case in the investment world, there's no one right answer for everyone. The more you know before making a choice, the better off you will be.

            To begin with, there are two important differences between the IRAs. First, a traditional IRA has the potential to grow tax deferred, while a Roth IRA's earnings have the potential to grow completely tax-free, provided you have had your account for at least five years and you do not begin taking withdrawals until you are 59½ . And second, contributions to a traditional IRA may be tax deductible (depending on your income and whether you or your spouse have access to an employer-sponsored retirement plan), while Roth IRA contributions are never deductible.

            On the other hand, the traditional and Roth IRAs share some things in common. Both have the same contribution limits ($4,000 in 2007, or $5,000 in 2007 if you are 50 or older) and both can be funded annually with virtually any type of investment: stocks, bonds, Certificates of Deposit, etc.

            So, given both the differences and the similarities, which IRA should you choose? Actually, you might not even have a choice. If you are single, and your adjusted gross income is more than $110,000, you cannot contribute to a Roth IRA; if you are married and filing jointly, the limit is $160,000.

            However, assuming your income level does permits you to choose between the two IRAs, you need to ask a key question: Does the potential tax deduction offered by a traditional IRA outweigh the advantage of the Roth IRA's tax-free earnings? As a (very) general rule, you might say that if you can make deductible contributions and you are going to be in a lower tax bracket upon retirement – and that is far from a certainty – you might come out ahead by selecting the traditional IRA. However, even this assumption requires some complex number-crunching. Before you made any decisions, consult with your tax professional.

            Apart from this comparison, what other factors could help you choose between a Roth or traditional IRA? Consider the following:

  • Your estimated retirement age. If you have a traditional IRA, you must start taking withdrawals when you reach 70½.  But if you own a Roth IRA, you are never required to take withdrawals. So, if you are still working at 70½  and you own a traditional IRA, you will have to take withdrawals, and pay taxes on them, while simultaneously paying income taxes on the compensation from your job.

  • Your need for retirement income. If you think you will be able to preserve a good chunk of your IRA, then you might find it advantageous to own a Roth IRA, which can continue potentially growing, tax-free, until your death, when it will pass on to your heirs. Of course, you can also leave a traditional IRA in your estate, but, since you will be forced to start taking withdrawals at 70½,  you might have significantly less to pass on than you would with a Roth IRA.

            Clearly, there is a lot to consider when choosing between a traditional IRA and a Roth IRA. See your tax advisor for help in making the right choice, but don't wait too long to put an IRA to work for you.

 
Copyright © 2006
The Wake Forest Gazette
All Rights Reserved