|
The Wake Forest Planning and Inspections
office was flooded with requests for
in-lawn irrigation plumbing permits
during June, 93 in all.
No individual irrigation
permits had been reported in the first
five months of 2007, although the
systems are included in the permits for
larger, more expensive homes in some
subdivisions.
The developers, builders and
homeowners all wanted to beat the July 2
deadline for a new water conservation
measure by the City of Raleigh that
requires separate meters for irrigation
systems. This is in addition to the
permanent mandatory restrictions on the
use of irrigation systems that also
began July 2.
The new separate meter
requirement adds substantial costs to an
irrigation system, as Raleigh’s Public
Utilities Director Dale Crisp outlined
this week.
First the city charges $178
to add the meter to a 5/8- or ¾-inch
line. Then it requires the owner
contract with someone or the city to
split the water service. The city
charges $650, and Crisp said people can
shop around for a lower cost. Thirdly,
there is a requirement the irrigation
system have an automatic controller on
the system. “Those controllers typically
have a rain sensor, but that is a
requirement as well,” Crisp said.
The good news is that there
is no additional charge for the water
used. Raleigh customers pay $1.70 per
100 cubic feet of water, double for
water customers who live outside the
city limits. One hundred cubic feet of
water is 748 gallons.
Water customers in Wake
Forest, Rolesville, Garner, Knightdale,
Wendell and Zebulon will continue to pay
the towns’ water rate while the
municipalities pay off the cost of
merging their water and sewer systems
with Raleigh’s. Wake Forest’s water and
sewer rates were frozen in 2005. Water
customers still pay a base rate of $4.60
plus $3.24 for every 1,000 gallons used;
sewer customers pay a base rate of $9.26
plus $4.86 for each 1,000 gallons of
water used.
The other good news: Water
customers “will not be paying the sewer
charge” for the irrigation water, Crisp
said. When the irrigation system runs
off the general household or business
meter, Raleigh and the other
municipalities charge for sewer based on
the amount of water used regardless of
how it is used.
Crisp said the city has
begun the separate meter requirement “to
be able to account for how much water is
being used for irrigation purposes.”
Wake Forest is strongly
discouraging the use of municipal
treated water for lawn and plant
irrigation. The town commissioners
adopted a water conservation policy in
June which says “Steps should be taken
to ensure new residents or business
owners do not use the municipal water
distribution system for irrigation” and
encourages current property owners and
residents to reduce or eliminate the use
of treated municipal water for
irrigation. Wells, rainwater systems
such as rain barrels or cisterns should
be used instead.
To reduce the need to
irrigate or water, the new policy
encourages the use of drought-tolerant
grasses and plants, native plants and
natural water retention in rain gardens,
bio-retention areas and green roofs.
Since last year, the
comprehensive planning committee and the
full board of commissioners have asked
every commercial and residential
developer to use something other than
treated water and most have found ways
to do so.
However, as Deputy Town
Manager Roe O’Donnell said last month,
the newer residents in Wake Forest are
generally using more water, in most
cases for irrigation, and creating a
need for the town to purchase more water
and sewer capacity from Raleigh.
The increased use means the
town has already had a very high peak
water use day before the usual peak use
time in July and August. Town customers
used 4.68 million gallons recently. The
contract with Raleigh says the town
cannot exceed a peak use of 4.91 mgd.
The result is the town will
probably have to purchase additional
water and sewer capacity from Raleigh.
It currently costs $5 per gallon for
water capacity, $4.50 per gallon for
sewer capacity.
If per-household use does
not decline because of the new water
conservation measures, the town might
have to spend $7.7 million for the
additional capacity. If use does
decline, that cost could be cut to $4.2
million. |